The
Exorcism of Emily Rose – Widescreen Unrated Version
Sony Pictures Home Entertainment / 2005 / 122 Minutes / Unrated
Street Date: December 20, 2005
Equal parts Inherit the Wind, The Exorcist, and The Verdict,
the surprise hit thriller The Exorcism of Emily Rose is smart
enough for those who appreciate intelligent fare, and dumb
enough for those who don’t. Granted, it’s not
an entirely successful balancing act. At its worst, this combo
of courtroom thriller and horror film tries to have it both
ways. But first time director Scott Derrickson populates his
film with three fiercely intelligent leads, who elevate the
material past the point at which most films would have just
stopped and been satisfied with cheap scares.
The movie begins with the death of its title character. So
right there, the mystery’s over. Luckily, there are
plenty of other mysteries to replace it. While attending college,
19-year old Emily Rose (Jennifer Carpenter) is invaded by
a demonic presence causing horrifying nightmares and forcing
her body to contort in grotesque ways. She returns to her
family’s rural home where her devout parents insist
that medication in not the answer. She’s obviously infested
with demons and requires an exorcism. The exorcism, performed
by Reverend Moore (Tom Wilkinson), results in Emily’s
death. Moore is charged with negligent homicide. The prosecutor
is Ethan Thomas (Campbell Scott), a Methodist able to sublimate
his own religious beliefs in order to find justice for the
dead teenager. Moore’s defense is provided by Erin Bruner
(Laura Linney), who accepts the job because if she wins, she’ll
become a partner in her law firm. So the agnostic must defend
the priest, while the Methodist is forced to prosecute him.
The courtroom scenes revolve around numerous tasty moral
quandaries. Did Emily suffer from a medical condition that
could have been solved by pharmaceuticals? Is Father Moore
guilty if he truly believed Emily needed an exorcism and did
the best he could be provide one? Can someone be possessed
by demons? But the movie is never satisfied with the more
thought-provoking aspects of its story. It feels it needs
to be a horror movie as well, which is where the film compromises.
For instance, Bruner’s clock stops every morning at
3 a.m., leading to scenes of her nervously walking around
her apartment, looking for who knows what. Later, with Bruner’s
bag of defense tricks empty, a surprise witness drops from
the sky. But no sooner is he ready to save the day, than he
mysteriously dies in a scene that feels lifted from The Omen.
We’re meant to consider that his death, and Erin’s
wayward clock, is the work of otherworldly forces. But when
your film is rooted in reality, why introduce such credibility-stretching
scenes? Why else would her clock stop every single night at
the witching hour of 3 a.m.? (Christ is thought to have died
at 3 p.m., so the inverse is considered the witching hour?)
It’s never explained. But the event proves that the
filmmakers believe supernatural forces exist, which therefore
undercuts a lengthy court trial to decide the issue.
Emily Rose is very loosely based on a Swedish case involving
a woman named Anneliese Michel, who died during an exorcism.
In the film, Father Moore describes Emily’s exorcism
in flashback during the trial. And the audience is never told
what to think. Derrrickson is about as even-handed as one
can hope for without creating a documentary. The success of
the film is wholly attributable to watching three intelligent
actors, Linney, Scott, and Wilkinson, debate the existence
of the Devil. Everything else is ballast, filling out the
narrative and making it more of a Saturday night popcorn movie.
I guess the economics of filmmaking make it necessary for
a movie like this to hedge its bets, so we’ll just have
to be happy with a comprised final product. I, for one, was
satisfied.
The Video: How Does The Disc Look?
Sony’s 2.40:1 offering is pretty fantastic. The color
palette is wider than most films of the genre, but the colors
are subdued. Blacks are smooth and inky, while shadow detail
is excellent. In fact, detail in general is great. I often
paused the picture to see if I could read various notebook
scribbles or book spines. And I always could. I saw no pixilation
or other problems during slow dissolves and transitions that
can betray digital artifacts. As someone tired of writing
how a DVD features a soft picture, it thrills me to say that
Emily Rose has a sharp picture, further absorbing you into
the film. The print is spotless. I did catch a smidge of edge
halos on less than half-a-dozen occasions, but I dare you
to care. There’s also a light layer of grain, but it
only added a cinematic quality to the film. A really sharp
transfer.
The Audio: How Does The Disc Sound?
The Dolby Digital 5.1 track is also aces. Naturally, horror
films need kickin’ mixes and Sony has provided one here.
The horror scenes feature lots of directional effects and
discernable detail. The sharper music stings don’t tear
at all, although I wished the bass were more forceful and
dense. Dialogue is very well rendered, with courtroom scenes
showing the slightest echo. It’s a forceful mix, but
it doesn’t overplay its hand, which is a good thing.
There are also English and French subtitles.
Supplements: What Goodies Are There?
There are two versions of the film available on DVD. One
is the theatrical cut, the other is an unrated cut. The unrated
cut, which is what I watched, contains about three extra minutes
of courtroom material. It’s a bit of a cheat. Calling
something an “unrated cut” makes the consumer
think the new scenes were too intense or scary for theatrical
release. No, it’s just more courtroom stuff. The new
version wasn’t submitted to the MPAA for a rating, so
it’s unrated.
There’s an audio commentary by director Scott Derrickson.
Emily Rose is Derrickson’s first big movie, and while
the film isn’t perfect, his intelligence and commitment
to filmic details can’t be questioned. He has plenty
of time to delve into most aspects of the making of the movie.
And in a decision that should earn him a medal, Derrickson
declined the “A Film By . . .” credit because
it wouldn’t honor his writing partner, who was integral
to the creation of the script. Derrickson’s choices
in terms of set design and sound give him the opportunity
to drop names like Ingmar Bergman. And while Derrickson would
gladly admit his film isn’t as good as the worst Bergman
film, at least he’s influenced by the right people.
A good track.
There is one deleted scene, which deserved to be deleted.
It involves Laura Linney’s character meeting a man in
a bar and taking him home. In the optional commentary by director
Scott Derrickson, he says he cut it for pacing and also because
he felt he’d seen these sorts of encounters in too many
other movies. The scene is nicely played by Linney, whose
character at that moment could use a friend. But ultimately
it was unnecessary.
There are three featurettes, which can be played one at a
time or all at once. The first is Genesis of the Story, a
twenty-minute piece where Derrickson and writer/producer Paul
Harris Boardman discuss how they came about the project and
the dozens of books they read as research. Laura Linney, Jennifer
Carpenter, and Tom Wilkinson chime in with junket-bites of
little interest. Still, it’s a good overview of how
the film came together.
Casting the Movie begins with Scott Derrickson saying that
he never writes with a specific actor in mind, because if
they can’t cast that person, the character is forever
sullied. The filmmakers decided to cast “up,”
meaning to cast actors better than a film like this would
normally deserve. Laura Linney admitted that most of these
types of film are “god awful,” so she had many
meetings with the filmmakers to make sure everyone was on
the same page. There’s a little bit of on-set footage,
the only time on the DVD we see any behind-the-scenes material.
The last featurette is Visual Design, during which production
designer David Brisbin, costume designer Tish Monaghan, visual
effects supervisor Michael Shelton, and animatronics designer
Terry Sandin talk about their contributions. Derrickson used
the works of certain painters as a jumping off point for the
color palette. He says that like Italian horror meister Dario
Argento, he wasn’t afraid to make horror look beautiful
and not just depressing.
Finally, there are trailers for Boogeyman, Into the Blue,
Mirrormask, Open Season, Sueno, The Cave, Da Vinci Code, The
Fog, The Gospel, The Grudge, The Pink Panther (2005), and
both the old and new versions of The Amityville Horror.
Final Thoughts
The Exorcism of Emily Rose tries to mesh two genres, horror
film and courtroom drama, into one coherent whole. While the
movie can’t quite reconcile the two, it scores big points
by taking its subject matter seriously while presenting both
sides of the argument with intelligence. Laura Linney, Campbell
Scott, and Tom Wilkerson are more than the movie deserves,
providing thespian-quality performances. Strip away the high
gloss and the horror and you’ve got an above average
Law and Order. I acknowledge that, but I still liked the film.
The DVD contains a sharp transfer and some solidly average
extras.
|